¿fue Al Palau a Pie O En El Coche De Vilaplana?: La Última Incógnita Sobre Mazón En La Tarde De La Dana

Key Highlights

  • The recibo del parking of Maribel Vilaplana reveals that she and Carlos Mazón spent more time together after leaving the restaurant El Ventorro than previously stated.
  • Mazón has consistently maintained he walked from the parking to the Palau de la Generalitat, despite new evidence suggesting otherwise.
  • The timeline of events surrounding the DANA tragedy is being re-evaluated in light of these new findings.

Investigating the Afternoon of DANA: Mazón’s and Vilaplana’s Time Together

The afternoon of 29 October 2024 remains a pivotal moment in the history of Valencia, marked by the DANA, a tragic event that claimed the lives of 229 people. The story of where former Generalitat President Carlos Mazón was during this critical period has been under scrutiny for over a year. New evidence from Maribel Vilaplana’s parking receipt suggests a more extended period of cohabitation than previously reported.

Recibo del Parking: A Closer Look

A recent article by Levante has highlighted the significance of a parking receipt for Vilaplana, indicating that she and Mazón remained together until 19:47. This revelation challenges previous statements from both individuals, who claimed to have parted ways around 18:30 or 18:45 after their meal at El Ventorro.

Mazón’s Walk vs. Vilaplana’s Ride

During his testimony and public appearances, Mazón has consistently maintained that he walked from the parking area to the Palau de la Generalitat, a distance of approximately 800 meters. He emphasized this point particularly during a session in the Congress where he was asked about his whereabouts.

Mazón’s insistence on walking to work contrasts with Vilaplana’s account, which was initially reported as ending around 17:45 but later adjusted to around 19:00. However, the parking receipt now suggests that they were together until at least 19:47.

New Timeline and Implications

The new evidence not only affects Mazón’s narrative but also raises questions about the timeline of events leading up to the DANA alert. According to Vicente Mompó, president of the Diputación, there were calls for an immediate alert by 19:10, a time that now seems earlier than initially thought.

Mazón was reportedly out of contact during this period, which has led to speculation about his exact whereabouts. This new information could potentially impact Mazón’s credibility and the overall understanding of how events unfolded on that fateful day.

Expert Analysis: The Impact on Public Perception

The reevaluation of Mazón’s activities that afternoon is part of a broader investigation into the DANA incident, which has sparked intense public debate. Political analyst Fernando García believes that this new information could alter the narrative surrounding the tragedy:

“The timeline is crucial in determining responsibility and accountability,” said García. “If Mazón was indeed present for longer than previously thought, it raises questions about his role during the critical period leading up to the disaster.”

Conclusion

A Re-Evaluation of Tragic Events

The parking receipt of Maribel Vilaplana has opened a new chapter in the ongoing investigation into the DANA tragedy. The extended timeline of Mazón and Vilaplana’s cohabitation challenges previous statements and could have significant implications for public perception and accountability.

As the investigation continues, it is clear that the events of 29 October 2024 are far from fully understood. With new evidence emerging, the full story remains to be told.