Key Highlights
- The article discusses the prevalence of British-born criminals in terrorist attacks and violent crimes.
- The author questions whether a British education can erase generations of aggression or honor culture influenced by immigrant backgrounds.
- It suggests that policies should focus on education, assimilation, and immigration to address the issue.
- The article mentions specific cases such as the LNER train attack, 7/7 bombings, Lee Rigby murder, and Manchester Arena bombing.
The Growing Concern of British-Born Criminals in Terrorism and Violence
Anthony Williams, the alleged attacker in the recent LNER knife incident, has been described by authorities as a “British-born” criminal. This designation, however, raises questions about the nature of violence in the UK and its connection to immigration policies.
The Pattern of British-Born Criminals
According to Daniel Hannan, a political commentator, there is a pattern where many notorious criminals and terrorists share one commonality: they are British-born. He points out that three out of the four 7/7 bombers, the Lee Rigby murder perpetrators, and other significant attacks like Westminster Bridge stabbing, London Bridge attack, Manchester Arena bombing, and Southport knife killer all have this characteristic.
Hannan argues that these cases suggest a deeper problem: “Are we supposed to be reassured that we bred these monsters ourselves? That our sweet air failed to waft away their violent proclivities?” He questions if the education system is effective in erasing generations of aggression, vendetta, and honor culture that might persist from immigrant backgrounds.
Immigrant Backgrounds and Criminal Behavior
The article delves into specific cases like Rudakubana, who murdered three girls with his knife. Government sources initially stated he was from Cardiff, but Hannan points out that Rudakubana’s parents were Rwandan immigrants, suggesting a possible connection to Rwanda’s history of genocide. Other examples include the London transport network attackers, Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale, Khalid Masood, and Salman Abedi.
Each case highlights the complexity of criminal behavior, with some perpetrators having immigrant backgrounds and others being British-born but influenced by their parents’ cultures or experiences. Hannan emphasizes that while most immigrants and their descendants are law-abiding, certain categories of crime persist among specific communities.
The Need for Policy Changes
To address these issues, Hannan advocates for a multifaceted approach: education, assimilation, and strict immigration policies. He suggests turning off the “immigration tap” to reduce the influx of individuals from more violent cultures. At the same time, he calls for inculcating patriotism in all British children, regardless of their heritage.
The author also criticizes the portrayal of British history as one of racism and exploitation, arguing that it is essential to present a balanced view that includes stories of freedom against the odds.
This approach could help integrate immigrants more effectively into British society.
Ultimately, Hannan believes that accurate data inputs are crucial for developing effective policies. He argues that certain immigrant communities statistically have higher rates of violent crimes and that this fact should guide immigration policy decisions.
