Key Highlights
- The author discusses the experience of judging the Booker prize.
- Judging involves reading a large number of novels in a short time.
- There is debate over whether the “best” books win the award.
- The process reveals human dynamics and group decision-making.
The Experience of Judging the Booker Prize: A Behind-the-Scenes Look
Erica Wagner, in an article for The Observer, delves into the world of judging the prestigious Booker prize. This award is one of the most significant literary accolades in the English-speaking world, and the process to select a winner involves reading numerous novels in a compressed timeframe.
A Race Against Time
Wagner explains that as judges, they must race through books with urgency, akin to those moments when every second counts. In 2014, she judged alongside other esteemed literary critics who collectively read an impressive 154 novels. This intense reading schedule is not just about speed but also about discernment and critical analysis.
According to Wagner, the process of judging is inherently unpredictable due to the complex dynamics among the judges.
The interactions within this group reveal much about human behavior in collaborative settings. Judges must navigate interpersonal challenges, such as ensuring that all voices are heard or addressing personal issues that might affect their judgment.
The Debate Over “Best” Books
One of the central questions Wagner poses is whether the best books win the award. She acknowledges the subjective nature of literary quality and how different publishers can influence which titles make it to the shortlist through strategic submissions. Publishers with a history of success in the Booker prize can submit more titles, thus increasing their chances.
Wagner also notes that while judges are dedicated professionals, their judgments may not always be purely objective.
She reflects on her mother’s saying about chocolate and vanilla, suggesting that personal preferences play a significant role in literary taste. This perspective challenges the notion of an impartial jury making decisions based solely on merit.
The Role of Time
In conclusion, Wagner asserts that time plays a crucial role in determining which books are recognized. She emphasizes that while judges strive to make the best possible decision within their limited timeframe, ultimately, it is the passage of time that will reveal whether a book stands the test of literary history.
For now, as judges race through piles of novels, the ultimate arbiter remains enigmatic and elusive – Time. This timeless truth underscores the ongoing debate about the nature of literary awards and the complex processes involved in recognizing excellence in literature.
