Pmqs Live: Starmer and Badenoch Clash Over Digital Id U-Turn

PMQs: A Clash of Policies and Principals

At the House of Commons, Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch engaged in a heated debate over government policy changes, particularly on mandatory digital IDs and inheritance tax for farmland. The session, known as PMQs (Prime Minister’s Questions), saw both sides presenting their viewpoints with fervor.

The Digital ID Controversy

Starmer, the leader of the Labour Party, took a firm stance against the government’s decision to abandon its plans for mandatory digital IDs. He accused the government of backing down on what he deemed as a “rubbish” policy. In contrast, Badenoch, the Secretary of State for Digital Infrastructure and Data Strategy, welcomed the latest U-turn, emphasizing that it was a “good move.” She highlighted that the initial plan to require workers to use digital IDs to prove their right to work in the UK had been “rubbish.”

U-Turns and Economic Policies

The exchange extended beyond just the digital ID scheme, with Badenoch cataloging a series of U-turns from the government. She cited changes such as the reduction of the threshold for inheritance tax on farms from £1 million to £2.5 million. Starmer defended his position by saying that the principle behind the policy was correct but acknowledged that ministers had listened to concerns and adjusted their stance.

Addressing Social Media Concerns

The Prime Minister also addressed a pressing concern regarding social media platform X, which has been under scrutiny for its AI tool being used to create sexualized images. The Prime Minister stated: “X is acting to ensure full compliance with UK law,” and added that the government was not going to back down on this issue.

The Battle of Words

Beyond these policy discussions, the session saw a display of political acumen and rhetoric. Starmer accused the Tories of being “IKEA shadow cabinet” members who held more positions in their 14 years in government than those found in the Kama Sutra. In return, Badenoch pointed to the government’s inconsistent policies, describing them as showing “no sense of direction.” The debate was filled with such exchanges, reflecting the ongoing tension between Labour and Conservative factions.

Conclusion

The PMQs session highlighted the continuous political battles within Parliament. With both Starmer and Badenoch presenting their cases, it was clear that the government’s policies were facing scrutiny from all angles. The exchange underscored the importance of consistency in policy-making and the willingness to adapt based on public concerns.

As the debate unfolded, the Prime Minister criticized social media giant X for its AI tool, while MPs from both sides engaged in a lively discussion that reflected the complex political landscape in Westminster.

The session ended with an acknowledgment of the government’s efforts to address concerns and a pledge not to back down on key issues. The House of Commons remains a crucible for these political debates, where the principles of policy-making are fiercely contested.