Key Highlights
- The 1987 adaptation of “The Running Man” stars Arnold Schwarzenegger and offers a goofier, cartoonier experience compared to Edgar Wright’s recent remake.
- This film is set in the year 2025, making it relevant for viewing in 2025 despite being released in 1987.
- While Edgar Wright’s version takes its dystopian elements seriously, the 1987 movie maintains a lighter tone and more inventive visuals.
A Remake That Isn’t Quite the Same: Comparing “The Running Man” (1987) to Its Modern Counterpart
When considering what movie to watch tonight, you might find yourself torn between Edgar Wright’s 2025 adaptation of The Running Man and its 1987 predecessor. Both versions offer unique perspectives on the classic dystopian tale, but they differ significantly in tone and execution.
A Different Kind of Dystopia: The Original “The Running Man” (1987)
The original The Running Man, directed by Paul Michael Glaser, offers a more lighthearted approach to the story compared to Wright’s darker interpretation. Released in 1987 and set against the backdrop of the same year—2025—it captures the spirit of an era when sci-fi was still tinged with humor and spectacle.
In this film, Ben Richards (played by Michael Biehn), a wrongfully imprisoned man, finds himself hunted for sport in a gladiatorial contest. The movie’s setting is confined to a section of Los Angeles, which allows the hunters—themed like action figures from popular slasher films—to become more cartoonish and fantastical. Characters such as Subzero (who kills with a hockey stick) and Buzzsaw make for memorable and campy scenes.
Edgar Wright’s “The Running Man” (2025): A More Serious Take
Conversely, Edgar Wright’s 2025 version of The Running Man takes a more serious approach to the dystopian elements. It presents a world where the government is openly oppressive and the audience’s complicity in the violence is a central theme. The film features a strong performance by Yahya Abdul-Mateen II as Ben Richards, who fights back against his oppressors.
Wright’s adaptation also explores the political and social ramifications of such a system, making it more than just an action spectacle. It delves into questions about government control, media manipulation, and individual resistance in a way that the 1987 film does not.
The Original’s Charm and Its Place in History
Despite its lighter tone, The Running Man (1987) remains an entertaining watch. It’s notable for being one of Schwarzenegger’s standout performances before he became a household name. The film’s mix of action, satire, and 1980s nostalgia makes it a worthwhile experience.“The Running Man” is currently available on Paramount+, offering viewers the chance to revisit this classic in a year that shares the same name as its fictional setting.
Conclusion
A Dual Viewing Experience
No matter which version you choose, both provide unique insights into the story. The 1987 adaptation offers a fun and inventive take on the dystopian premise, while Edgar Wright’s modern retelling delves deeper into its darker themes. Whether you’re looking for a nostalgic trip or a more serious exploration of the genre, there’s something in this pair to satisfy your curiosity.
So, what movie should you watch tonight?
Consider revisiting The Running Man (1987) on Paramount+ and see how it stands up against its 2025 counterpart. It’s a compelling choice for any fan of action movies or those interested in the evolution of dystopian storytelling.
Jesse Hassenger is a writer living in Brooklyn, where he contributes to The A.V. Club, Polygon, and The Week among others. Follow him on Twitter at @rockmarooned.
