Key Highlights
- Keith Richards of The Rolling Stones criticized Bruce Springsteen as “too contrived” in the 1980s.
- Richards, known for his instinctual approach to rock and roll, found Springsteen’s polished style at odds with his own aesthetic.
- The disagreement between the two artists is rooted in their differing philosophies on music creation and performance.
Keith Richards’ Musical Critiques
Musical icon Keith Richards has always been unflinching in sharing his opinions, both supportive and critical. In the 1980s, he targeted a beloved artist for his “too contrived” style, marking a notable clash of musical philosophies.
The Rolling Stones’ Evolution
By the 1980s, The Rolling Stones had transitioned from their rebellious roots to an establishment act. Their evolution mirrored that of many rock bands, from youthful misfits to multi-millionaires living in luxury and performing to adoring fans worldwide.
The Clash with Bruce Springsteen
During one interview in 1988, Richards took issue with Bruce Springsteen’s music, describing it as “too contrived.” Despite their shared love for blues rock, this criticism stemmed from Richards’ suspicion of anything overly calculated. For a guitarist who valued looseness and danger over polished performances, Springsteen’s meticulous approach seemed artificial.
Philosophical Differences
The contrast between Richards’ celebration of attitude and swagger versus the narrative-driven storytelling of Springsteen highlights their differing approaches to music creation. While Richards prioritized feel and instinct, others like Springsteen focused on emotional clarity and theatricality. This philosophical divide led Richards to assert that Springsteen was “Too overblown.”
Richards’ Public Performances with Springsteen
In spite of his criticism, Richards has performed alongside Springsteen numerous times, indicating a level of mutual respect or camaraderie between the two. However, this did not prevent Richards from voicing his opinion in his memoir, “Life,” where he further stated that if better options were available, Springsteen would still be working bars in New Jersey.
Context and Analysis
This disagreement with Springsteen is a testament to The Rolling Stones’ role as both rock elders and critics of contemporary music. It reflects the complex nature of musical evolution and the personal tastes that shape artistic judgments. Richards’ comments, while critical, also highlight his deep understanding of the craft and the evolving landscape of popular music.
Despite their differing philosophies, Richards and Springsteen share a legacy in rock music. Their interactions, both positive and negative, contribute to the rich tapestry of musical history and continue to resonate with fans and musicians alike.
