Key Highlights
- Rod Liddle reflects on the nostalgic return of classic TV series.
- Play for Today is revisited through a critical lens despite past admiration.
- Bullseye, a game show, is discussed with comparisons to its original run.
- The article touches upon current television trends and critiques recent revivals.
Reflecting on Nostalgia in Television
Rod Liddle delves into the bittersweet experience of revisiting classic British TV series, highlighting how nostalgia can sometimes distort our memories. He expresses a mix of fondness and disappointment as he watches “Play for Today,” a once-beloved drama series that has been revived for modern audiences.
Play for Today: A Nostalgic Revival?
The original “Play for Today” ran from 1970 to 1984, showcasing a variety of short dramas by renowned writers. Liddle fondly remembers the series, recalling memorable works like “Blue Remembered Hills,” “Bar Mitzvah Boy,” and “Home.” However, he notes that this series was often overshadowed by less successful entries, which have since been forgotten.
The first episode of the new run, titled “Never Too Late,” starring Anita Dobson and Nigel Havers in a soap-like setting, is harshly criticized. Liddle finds it shallow and predictable, comparing it unfavorably to long-running British soap operas like “Emmerdale.” He expresses hope that future episodes will bring better writing.
Bullseye: A Game Show with Modern Flair
Turning his attention to the return of “Bullseye,” Liddle recalls his dislike for the original show, which he sees as a relic of past television. The new version features more expensive sets and a ritzier musical score, along with confected hysteria from the audience. Freddie Flintoff is praised for his improved hosting style compared to Jim Bowen’s.
The article notes that “Bullseye” now includes remakes of other classic shows like “It Ain’t Half Hot Mum,” “Robin’s Nest,” and “3-2-1.” Liddle suggests this reflects a broader trend in television, where networks cater to audiences’ desire for the past by reviving old favorites.
Current Trends in Television
Liddle’s reflections extend beyond these specific shows to comment on the current state of British television. He mentions “Celebrity Race Across the World” as an example of a show that, while enjoyable, lacks depth compared to previous seasons. The article also pokes fun at quiz show hosts like Amanda Holden, highlighting how their presence can detract from the overall quality of programming.
The piece concludes with Liddle’s musings on Richard Burton and his legacy, showing how nostalgia for past celebrities can be as complex and multifaceted as revisiting old TV shows. He ends by inviting readers to share their thoughts on recent television trends in the comments section.
Conclusion
Rod Liddle’s piece serves as a reminder that while nostalgia can be a powerful force, it often leads us to idealize past experiences. Through his critical eyes, we see how both “Play for Today” and “Bullseye,” now revisited with modern sensibilities, offer mixed results in terms of entertainment value and quality. As television continues to evolve, these reflections provide insight into the challenges and opportunities facing contemporary programming.
