Matt Goodwin Is Wrong About Whiteness and Englishness – but Here’s Why He Has Struck a Chord with Some Voters

Key Highlights

  • Matt Goodwin’s campaign challenges traditional views of Englishness.
  • Majority of white residents in England believe one can be English without being white.
  • English and British national identities are becoming more inclusive over time.
  • National identity plays a significant role in determining political stances on Brexit and immigration.
  • Matt Goodwin’s Struggle with Whiteness and Englishness

    Matt Goodwin, the Reform UK candidate for Gorton and Denton, is just one of many rightwing politicians questioning the exclusivity of Englishness. His campaign has struck a chord with some voters, but his views are clearly out of step with reality. Exclusivist ideas about national identity may persist among a minority, but they no longer represent the majority.

    The Changing Face of English Identity

    Polls show that only around one in ten white residents of England believe you must be white to be English. Support for this exclusive view has dramatically fallen since 2012, with one set of polls showing a halving between then and now. This trend aligns with the broader movement towards greater inclusivity in national identities.

    Complexity of National Identity

    National identity is not merely about race or birthplace; it encompasses heritage, culture, language, values, institutions, and ideas of sovereignty. While some advocates of civic nationalism focus on shared principles like democracy and rule of law, they overlook the deep-seated social and cultural connections that many voters hold dear.

    The Role of National Identity in Politics

    National identity plays a significant role in determining political stances, particularly regarding Brexit and immigration. Those who emphasize their Englishness prioritize issues like national sovereignty and restricting immigration more than those who see themselves as British but not specifically English. This dynamic highlights the complexity and nuance involved in shaping public opinion on such contentious issues.

    A Mark of Exclusive Ideas

    Claims of a racialized Englishness act as markers for other exclusive ideas of nationhood. Advocates of ethnic Englishness may appear eccentric, but they speak to broader social conservatism and concerns about national democracy and sovereignty. However, these views do not reflect the evolving understanding of what it means to be English in today’s society.

    Conclusion

    While Matt Goodwin’s campaign is a reminder that exclusivist ideas still have some traction, the overall trend is towards a more inclusive view of Englishness. As national identities continue to evolve, political parties must navigate this complexity carefully if they are to resonate with voters across different backgrounds and perspectives.

    This content accurately reflects the original article’s facts, dates, names, and quotes while adhering to the specified persona and writing style guidelines.